AI governance and cross-border deployment

China's AI Export Rules: APIs, Hosting and Registration

•Make Better Editorial

China proposed controls on 23 AI technologies. Learn which transfers require registration now and how API access differs from overseas deployment.

On October 16, 2026, China's Ministry of Commerce and Ministry of Science and Technology proposed revisions to the Catalogue of Technologies Prohibited or Restricted from Export. The draft covers 40 technologies, including 23 AI entries spanning large models, agents, computing clusters and information processing. The proposal is open for comment until November 15. A separate temporary pre-export registration requirement took effect on October 16. This distinction matters: the new announcement is not an immediate ban on every Chinese AI model or API.

Draft controls versus registration already in effect

MOFCOM's official explanation says 14 of the proposed entries would be prohibited and 26 restricted across AI, biomedicine and photovoltaics. The final technical thresholds and rules remain subject to consultation. The 23 AI entries are part of the proposed list, not evidence that every model, application or publicly available AI technique is covered.

Until the final revised catalogue takes effect, exporters of technologies listed in the announcement must register covered transfers before export. The notice includes transactions already started but not yet completed. Registration applies to transferring technology ownership abroad, licensing domestic technology for foreign use, changes that place domestic technology under foreign ownership or control, and other cases specifically designated by MOFCOM. The official system asks for exporter and recipient details, destination, intended use and expected value.

API access and overseas hosting are different cases

An important distinction concerns how a model reaches overseas users. MOFCOM says transferring restricted technology for overseas local deployment falls within technology-export management once the rules are implemented. Some overseas self-operated cloud deployments may qualify for facilitated licensing. By contrast, access to a restricted large model through an API, website, app or SaaS does not itself count as the large-model technology export addressed by this proposal. That is not a blanket exemption from other applicable laws or a determination about any particular contract.

Open-source and public-domain exclusions

Open-source status also needs careful interpretation. The announcement excludes AI technology already in the public domain through open-source publication or academic papers. MOFCOM separately describes automatic licensing and other facilitation for certain activities, including open-source work and international research. Teams should distinguish genuinely public material from confidential technical assets. A marketing label alone does not establish the legal classification of a transfer.

Make Better example: service versus technology transfer

Consider two business models. A hosted service can provide overseas customers with model responses while keeping the underlying technology in its existing environment. A separate overseas deployment agreement may give a foreign entity access to restricted nonpublic technology or ownership rights. The official explanation treats these situations differently. Actual contracts can combine service access and technology transfer, so product labels should not replace a documented review of the facts.

What AI teams should review

For an operational review, first list the exact technology and intellectual property involved, then map who owns and controls it, where it will run, and what rights or technical materials will move abroad. Compare the arrangement with the official annex and current registration notice. Identify unfinished transactions. Preserve a written classification rationale and seek qualified local guidance for any potentially covered export before proceeding.

  1. Inventory technology and ownership rights.
  2. Map overseas recipients, hosting and control.
  3. Classify the actual transfer against the official annex.
  4. Check current registration requirements for ongoing deals.
  5. Monitor the final catalogue after consultation.

The proposal's consultation closes November 15, 2026. Final restrictions, thresholds, licensing procedures and enforcement practice may differ from the current draft. This article summarizes official statements available on October 17 and does not provide individualized legal advice. For cross-border model deployment, the practical next step is to distinguish service access from a transfer of controlled technology and track the final catalogue.

FAQ

Questions people ask

Are China's proposed AI export restrictions already final?

No. The catalogue additions announced October 16, 2026 were open for public comment through November 15. But a separate temporary registration requirement started immediately for covered technology exports, including certain unfinished transactions. Organizations should treat registration and future catalogue licensing as distinct obligations and check the final published rules before making long-term assumptions.

Can Chinese AI models still be offered overseas through APIs or SaaS?

MOFCOM's October 16 explanation says providing access to a restricted large model through APIs, websites, apps or SaaS does not itself fall within the particular large-model technology-export scope described. Overseas deployment involving transfer of restricted technology is different. This does not waive other legal requirements, and agreements combining services with technology transfer need individual review.

Does China's AI export proposal cover open-source models?

The announcement excludes AI technologies already in the public domain through open-source releases or academic publication. The ministry also discusses simplified licensing for specified international cooperation and open-source activities. That does not establish that every product described as open source qualifies, or that confidential technical know-how can be transferred without considering the actual scope of the rules.

China's October 16 announcement contains both a proposed catalogue revision and an immediate registration measure. AI teams should distinguish overseas service access from the transfer of restricted technology and monitor the final rules.

Sources & useful resources